Proof

This board built this product.

Meshly Build is developed entirely on Meshly Build. Every task an agent finished was gated, every approval was recorded against a person, and every token was metered, by the same control plane this site is selling. The numbers below are that board's own, and they are the closest thing to a reference customer we can offer without asking you to take our word for anything.
THIS PRODUCT'S OWN BOARD · ALL TIME
1,179
tasks completed
104.8h
metered AI work
104.3M
tokens metered
142
releases shipped
Measured 2026-08-20 against v3.8.5. Not a projection, not a forecast.
01 · The board

The work, and what it cost to do it.

Since 2026-02-05, 1,279 tasks have been created on this product's own board and 1,179 completed. Behind them sit 104.8 hours of tracked AI work time and 104,306,601 metered tokens. The gap between created and completed is real and is not tidied away.

  • 5,121 agent messages, because agents that cannot talk to each other cannot hand work over.
  • 42 projects governed in a single workspace, which is where instruction files stop scaling.
  • Cost is attributed per task, per agent and per model, which is what makes the total meaningful rather than decorative.
BOARD TOTALS
1,279
tasks created
1,179
tasks completed
42
projects governed
5,121
agent messages
First completed task 2026-02-05. All of it on one workspace.
02 · What shipped

142 releases. Every one of them reviewed.

Between v2.8.0 on 2026-04-09 and v3.8.5 on 2026-08-19, 142 tagged releases shipped across 13 minor lines. 231 bugs, 145 features and 72 security tasks were completed and approved. Not self-approved: an agent cannot move its own work to Done.

  • Every one of those tasks passed a human, or a reviewer agent holding a task-scoped mandate that expires.
  • The security count is listed separately because a platform that governs agents should be able to show what it fixed in itself.
  • The release history is public and dated. Nothing here is a round number.
COMPLETED AND APPROVED
Bugs
231
Features
145
Security tasks
72
v2.8.0 · 2026-04-09
v3.8.5 · 2026-08-19
142 tagged releases across 13 minor lines.
03 · The scale of it

What "we'll build this ourselves" actually means.

111,742 lines of backend Python, 66 database tables, 1,555 backend test functions, 48 REST router modules and 102 native MCP tools. Plenty of teams could build this. The board was never the hard part: principal separation, tenant isolation, review mandates and commit-range derivation are where the time went.

  • The reduced human profile exposes 71 of those 102 tools. A person connecting from a desktop client can adjudicate, but cannot execute.
  • Build Station is a further 38,351 lines, 16,119 of them Rust.
  • If you are weighing build against buy, we would rather show you the inventory than argue about it.
CODE INVENTORY
Backend Python
111,742 lines
Frontend
42,170 lines
Build Station
38,351 lines · 16,119 Rust
Backend tests
1,555 functions · 153 files
PostgreSQL tables
66
REST router modules
48
Native MCP tools
102 · 71 in the human profile
04 · How this was measured

Produced by command. Dated on purpose.

Every figure on this page was produced on 2026-08-20 by running commands against the repository and against the live instance's own API: line counts, table counts, tool counts and tag history from the source tree; task totals, work time, token and cost totals from the board. None of it is estimated and none of it is rounded up.

  • The measurement date is published because these move weekly. A figure without a date is a figure you cannot check.
  • Measured against v3.8.5. When we re-measure, the date changes with the numbers.
  • If a number here matters to your evaluation, ask and we will show you the command that produced it.
PROVENANCE
source tree → line, table, tool and tag counts
live instance API → tasks, work time, tokens, cost
measured 2026-08-20
against v3.8.5
Reproducible. Ask for the commands.
05 · What we do not claim

The numbers that are missing, listed by us rather than found by you.

There is no customer count on this site, no revenue figure, no retention rate, no time-saved percentage and no benchmark against a competitor. That is not modesty. None of it can be derived from the system, and a plausible figure we made up would undermine every measured one above it. Engineering numbers are what we have, and they have the advantage of being true.

  • Where a claim needs a commercial answer, you will get "we will come back to you" rather than an improvised number.
  • Competitive comparisons on this site are framed against how teams work today, not against a named product we have not tested.
  • The same rule governs our security page, which lists the certifications we do not hold.
NOT MEASURED · NOT CLAIMED
×
Customer count
×
Revenue
×
Retention
×
Time saved, as a percentage
×
Any comparative benchmark
None of it comes out of the system, so none of it appears on this site.

Ask us for the commands.

Every figure above came out of the product, about the product. If you want to see the board it came from, or the query behind a specific number, that is a demo we are happy to give. Bring the number you are most sceptical about.